Aarti's mother rebuts Ravi Mohan amid divorce row

A Class 10 exam should be about textbooks, timetables, and nervous revision. In Ravi Mohan and Aarti’s family, it has now become part of a painful public divorce row.

Aarti’s mother, Sujata Vijayakumar, has pushed back strongly against the actor’s recent claims. Her sharpest point was not about image, money, or fame. It was about her grandson, who she said is under severe emotional strain while writing his board exams.

That detail changes the mood of the story. A celebrity split can look like another headline from the outside. Inside a family, especially with children watching, it becomes far messier.

Sujata challenges Ravi’s claims

Sujata spoke to reporters after Ravi Mohan’s emotional press meet, where he accused Aarti of mistreating him. He also said he had faced years of humiliation in the marriage.

Ravi claimed that he had lived like a slave and that he had stayed silent for too long. He said people saw him as soft because of his screen image and public manner. He added that he would no longer remain that way.

Sujata denied several allegations made against Aarti, including charges linked to cyber attacks. She also rejected Ravi’s claim that he was not being allowed to meet his sons, Aarav and Ayaan.

Her response had the tone of someone who believed the public had heard only one side. She referred to an old magazine interview from 2008 and asked who had really pressured whom before the marriage.

Old wounds return in public

The most striking part of Sujata’s response was her reference to an old allegation. She asked who had cut their wrist to make the marriage happen.

That remark appeared to answer Ravi’s own dramatic gesture at the press meet. He had reportedly shown his wrist while speaking about emotional distress and suicide.

This is where celebrity conflict becomes deeply uncomfortable. Private hurt, once carried into cameras and microphones, stops belonging only to the people involved.

For fans of Jayam Ravi, this is also a difficult turn. His public identity has long rested on likeability, calmness, and a certain softness. That makes this dispute feel more personal for followers who grew up watching him.

But screen image cannot settle a family dispute. Nor can public sympathy decide who suffered more inside a marriage. That work belongs to courts, families, and careful evidence, not social media camps.

Children caught in the glare

Sujata said her grandson is writing his Class 10 exams and is emotionally disturbed by the fight. She said he is seeing things at an age when he should not have to face them.

That line will hit many Indian parents hard. Board exams still carry huge pressure in most homes. Even in wealthy or famous families, the anxiety can be real.

A child in such a situation does not need viral clips or angry posts. He needs routine, quiet, and adults who lower the noise around him.

This is the human cost that gets lost when celebrity marriages become public theatre. People debate who looked more convincing, who cried, who spoke sharply. The children do not get to opt out.

Aarav and Ayaan are now names in a public dispute through no choice of their own. That should make everyone pause, including fans who treat celebrity separations like weekend entertainment.

Fame makes divorce louder

Ravi Mohan has said he will not act in films until he legally gets a divorce from Aarti. He said he wants life to return to normal after the cyber attacks stop.

That statement adds another layer to the story. In cinema, an actor’s work, brand, and personal life often sit too close together. A family dispute can quickly affect producers, schedules, fans, and future releases.

Tamil cinema has seen this before, though every case has its own facts. When a star’s private life becomes public, the industry watches quietly. Nobody wants to offend the actor, the family, or the audience.

For Ravi, stepping away from films until the divorce comes through is a bold public line. It also places pressure on the legal process, because film careers cannot pause forever.

For Aarti’s side, Sujata’s response signals that they do not plan to let his version dominate the conversation. Her remarks suggest the family wants the older history of the relationship placed on record too.

Social media takes sides fast

The cyber attack allegation is important because celebrity disputes now unfold in two courts. One is legal. The other is online.

The online court moves faster and usually knows less. It picks heroes and villains from short clips, emotional lines, and old photos. Then it punishes the chosen villain for days.

Ravi said cyber attacks must end before he returns. Sujata denied allegations against Aarti. Between those two positions sits a very familiar Indian internet problem.

Fans often think loyalty means attacking the other side. In family disputes, that behaviour can hurt people who are already under stress. It can also worsen the lives of children attached to the case.

This is especially true when the story involves mental health, marriage breakdown, and exam pressure. These are not clean entertainment categories. They are fragile human realities.

The Ravi Mohan and Aarti divorce row now sits at a delicate point. The public has heard pain from his side and a firm rebuttal from hers. The law will take its course, but the noise around it can still be controlled. For ordinary readers, the lesson is simple. Fame may make a family fight visible, but it does not make it easier. When children are watching, the adults in the room need to remember what really matters.